This week's reporting converges on two fronts: Indo-Pacific posturing and the unsettled lessons of drone warfare. Taiwan's war games, PACOM's reconsideration of Micronesia infrastructure, Beijing's South China Sea maneuvering, and the Solomon Islands port deal all point to a contested basing and signaling contest well short of conflict.
Simultaneously, Ukraine's drone war is generating bad doctrine as fast as good tactics, even as the Marine Corps races toward mass attack-drone fielding — the autonomy debate remains the sharper thread.
Forwarded this? Subscribe here. If the Weekly is useful to you, become a Community Patron — support a 501(c)(3), join the IW WhatsApp community, gain access to IWI webinars — and help keep this work independent. Join under “Account” when logged in at irregularwarfare.org. Feedback on the format? admin@irregularwarfare.org.
Featured • Irregular Warfare Podcast
Five Years After the Withdrawal: Insights from the Afghanistan War Commission
Dr. Colin Jackson and Col. (Ret.) E.J. Degen join to share early findings from the Afghanistan War Commission. The episode centers on a hard question: what the 20-year effort to build Afghan security forces reveals about the promise and limits of security force assistance as an exit strategy.
The IW Weekly is made possible through the generous support of Stratagem Consulting. We're especially grateful to Mick Crnkovich, Founder and CEO of Stratagem, for championing thoughtful, practitioner-oriented resources in the national security space.
Corporate Sponsors
The following organizations support IWI's mission to advance the study of irregular warfare.
Irregular Warfare Initiative
Keep Warfare Irregular
Bridging the gap between irregular warfare scholars, practitioners, and policymakers.