China's maritime gray-zone pressure campaign, the institutionalization of cognitive and narrative warfare, and a running debate over SOF identity and purpose at the threshold of large-scale combat.
Beijing's coast guard surge east of Taiwan, the flotilla activity amid the Philippines-Japan spat, and contingency planning pieces from Manila and Tokyo all point to deliberate threshold-testing. Cognitive warfare runs as the connective tissue. Taiwan named Beijing's patrols a cognitive warfare act, the Army published its new PSYOP approach, and pieces from Mali to Europe treat perception management as an operational domain, a framing that also drives the SOF identity debate across IWI, Small Wars Journal, and Army Press.
Forwarded this? Subscribe here. If the Weekly is useful to you, become a Community Patron — support a 501(c)(3), join the IW WhatsApp community, gain access to IWI webinars — and help keep this work independent. Join under “Account” when logged in at irregularwarfare.org. Feedback on the format? admin@irregularwarfare.org.
Featured · Irregular Warfare Podcast
Setting Out to Win: Why America Needs to Get Serious About Irregular Warfare
This episode examines why the United States has failed at irregular warfare and what it would take to reverse that trajectory — not merely to deter, but to actually win. While irregular warfare is on the rise around the globe today, the United States has largely failed at irregular warfare over the past 75 years. Key issues our guests identify include a military oriented for conventional war, inconsistent knowledge and education about irregular warfare, as well as the lack of a dedicated US government organization that can increase interagency cooperation along with a focus on preparing the operational environment.