Drone proliferation cuts across every theater this week — CENTCOM's new multinational attack drone task force, gang warfare in Latin America adopting Ukrainian TTPs, and command-and-control gaps flagged at West Point all point to autonomy outpacing doctrine.
The stronger thread is gray-zone convergence: China's coast guard and maritime militia squeezing Taiwan and the Philippines, Russia's Baltic "maritime insurgency" and hybrid probing of NATO, and Houthi escalation inside the Iran war show rivals settling on sub-threshold coercion as the default mode of competition.
Forwarded this? Subscribe here. If the Weekly is useful to you, become a Community Patron — support a 501(c)(3), join the IW WhatsApp community, gain access to IWI webinars — and help keep this work independent. Join under “Account” when logged in at irregularwarfare.org. Feedback on the format? admin@irregularwarfare.org.
Featured
Irregular Warfare Is Not A Thing
The article asks why decades of doctrinal debate have failed to produce a workable definition of irregular warfare — and argues the term isn't one coherent concept at all. It contends "irregular warfare" actually spans four distinct, overlapping communities and questions (dealing with irregular adversaries, structuring special operations forces, advancing interests short of conflict, and employing irregular methods), and that treating them as a single construct breeds contradiction, policymaker distrust, and zero-sum rivalry among practitioners.
The IW Weekly is made possible through the generous support of Stratagem Consulting. We're especially grateful to Mick Crnkovich, Founder and CEO of Stratagem, for championing thoughtful, practitioner-oriented resources in the national security space.
Corporate Sponsors
The following organizations support IWI's mission to advance the study of irregular warfare.
Irregular Warfare Initiative
Keep Warfare Irregular
Bridging the gap between irregular warfare scholars, practitioners, and policymakers.