More Than “Wet Gap Crossings”: Riverine Capabilities Are Needed For Irregular Warfare And Beyond
Walker Mills Given its centrality to Ukraine’s commercial and trade development, it is not surprising that the Dnipro River has again become a focal point for the ongoing war in Ukraine. Both Russian and Ukrainian forces have used Ukrainian waterways as space to maneuver troops and move supplies. Ukrainian
More Than “Wet Gap Crossings”: Riverine Capabilities Are Needed For Irregular Warfare And Beyond
This Irregular Warfare Initiative article was originally posted through our partner organization, the Modern War Institute at West Point. Editor’s Note: This article is part of IWI’s Project Maritime, a series exploring the intersection of irregular warfare and the modern maritime dimension. The project aims to contextualize challenges
In The Eye Of The Beholder: Legitimacy, Drones, And US Counterterrorism Policy
Paul Lushenko Legitimacy—the public’s beliefs in the appropriateness of some behavior—is central to the sustainability of US drone strikes abroad. Research shows that the public does not generally challenge policies and actions it deems legitimate, which helps preserve space for officials to make decisions on sensitive issues
The Overlooked Irregular Warfare Expert The Pentagon Should Study Today
Nathaniel L. Moir In his 1961 book about warfare in Southeast Asia, Street Without Joy, Bernard Fall, the Howard University professor and former French Resistance fighter, explained, “A dead Special Forces sergeant is not spontaneously replaced by his own social environment. A dead revolutionary usually is.” Fall’s point was
The Many Faces Of Al-Shabaab
Benjamin Jebb and Matthew Moellering Episode 71 of the Irregular Warfare Podcast examines the often misunderstood security dynamics of Somalia and al-Shabaab. Our guests begin by describing the complex security landscape of Somalia. They then examine al-Shabaab in depth and analyze the intricate methods the organization uses to maintain its
An Eye For An Eye: The Dynamics of Blood Revenge In Civil War
Emil Aslan, David S. Siroky and Roberto Colombo Over the past fifty years, about two-thirds of all civil wars have occurred in countries where customary traditions of honor and retaliation regulate social life. Firmly embedded in the fabric of local societies, the customary code of blood revenge—the practice of
“By, With, And Through” Will Not Save US Forces From Direct Combat: American Ground Force Contributions To The Campaign Against ISIS
Jeff Martini, Sean Zeigler and Gian Gentile In 2016, as it was pushing ISIS from its Euphrates valley strongholds in Iraq, the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS weighed how best to speed up the military campaign. The coalition ultimately chose to expand its military involvement in support of Iraqi forces,
Competition Campaigning: What It Looks Like And Implications for US Special Operations Command
Jonathan Schroden In March 2022, the Pentagon released a new National Defense Strategy (NDS) that identified China as the “most consequential strategic competitor” of the United States. The NDS also described two concepts—integrated deterrence and campaigning—as primary means by which the Department of Defense will seek to address
Misguided Citizens: India's Approach to Counterinsurgency
Jeff Phaneuf and Adam Darnley-Stuart Episode 70 of the Irregular Warfare Podcast explores the nuances of India’s approach to counterinsurgency throughout the nation’s history. Our guests assess the Indian counterinsurgency experience, including India’s philosophical approach, tactical innovations throughout India’s history, and the critical difference between fighting
Al-Shabaab And The Grim Realities of Somalia's Forever War
Sam Wilkins Despite over a decade of international military interventions, the al-Qaeda-affiliated terrorist group known as al-Shabaab remains the most capable extremist organization on the African continent. On October 30, the group served up a deadly reminder of its continued relevance when it detonated a bomb in Mogadishu that killed
Bridging the gap between irregular warfare scholars, practitioners, and policymakers.
